Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PSC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PSC returned +21.0% to VTWO's +14.3%; 36% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PSC and VTWO

Net assets: $2.7bn on Oct 26, 2026 for Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+21.0%
PSC total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.38%
PSC expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.7 points.

PSC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePSCVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+21.0%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high7.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.38%0.06%
Net assets, PSC as of Oct 26, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026$2.7bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common36%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.2%5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 30, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 525 weekly returns · each against IWM
PSC VTWO
Return
Total return edge PSC +204.6% +155.0%
Annualized edge PSC +11.7% +9.7%
Price return edge PSC +170.5% +123.7%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 23.2% 22.7%
Max drawdown edge VTWO −44.9% −40.2%
Downside capture 91.9% 99.6%
Beta 0.95 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PSC 0.49 0.41
Sortino edge PSC 0.70 0.60
Treynor 0.118 0.094
Calmar edge PSC (slight) 0.26 0.24
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.4% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.96 0.73
Information ratio 0.24 0.15
Tracking error 8.1% 0.7%
Reading

PSC returned more: +204.6% to +155.0%. PSC and VTWO swung about the same: 23.2% and 22.7%. VTWO fell less at its worst: −40.2% to −44.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PSC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePSCVTWOIWMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+204.6%+155.0%PSCPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.7%+9.7%PSCTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+170.5%+123.7%PSCPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.2%22.7%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.0%15.7%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−44.9%−40.2%VTWODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture84.9%99.1%100.0%VTWOShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture91.9%99.6%100.0%PSC (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.950.991.00PSC lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.881.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.490.41PSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.700.60PSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1180.0940.093PSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.260.24PSC (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWMIWMIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.4% a year+0.2% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.960.73Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.5% to +7.4%−0.3% to +0.6%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.240.15PSCReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error8.1%0.7%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 525 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

36%

By the books each fund has filed, PSC and VTWO hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

36% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PSC VTWO
Moog Inc 0.46% 0.36%
10X Genomics Inc 0.41% 0.35%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.52% 0.31%
CareTrust REIT Inc 0.42% 0.29%
Krystal Biotech Inc 0.40% 0.29%
Protagonist Therapeutics Inc 0.47% 0.28%
FirstCash Holdings Inc 0.49% 0.28%
InterDigital Inc 0.33% 0.28%
Brinker International Inc 0.64% 0.28%
HealthEquity Inc 0.47% 0.24%
Zeta Global Holdings Corp 0.78% 0.24%
Plexus Corp 0.32% 0.23%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PSC
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.38%
DigitalOcean Holdings Inc 1.19%
Sterling Infrastructure Inc 1.17%
Vicor Corp 1.05%
TTM Technologies Inc 1.03%
Guardant Health Inc 0.87%
Planet Labs PBC 0.84%
Rambus Inc 0.79%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
Glaukos Corp 0.31%
Viasat Inc 0.30%
Cytokinetics Inc 0.29%
Hut 8 Corp 0.29%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +21.0% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.1% (IWM) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark +6.9 pts vs IWM +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.38% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.5%
Holdings 506 2002
Net assets, PSC as of Oct 26, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $2.7bn $16.6bn

PSC and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-9E0901FD0F

PSC and VTWO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. PSC follows No index, actively managed and VTWO follows Russell 2000 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 36% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PSC returned +21.0% and VTWO +14.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PSC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PSC

PSC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 11.2%.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PSC or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PSC returned +21.0% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, PSC or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PSC and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of PSC and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PSC against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/psc-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.