Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IJR vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJR returned +17.5% to VTWO's +14.3%; 46% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IJR and VTWO

Net assets: $104.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+17.5%
IJR total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.06%
IJR expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.06% a year; their one-year returns differ by 3.2 points; IJR is 6.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IJR vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJRVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high6.8%, high on Aug 14, 20267.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P SmallCap 600Russell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.06%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$102.6bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common46%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.3%5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 838 weekly returns
IJR VTWO
Return
Total return edge IJR +484.8% +409.2%
Annualized edge IJR (slight) +11.6% +10.6%
Price return edge IJR +364.9% +315.9%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 20.9% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge VTWO (slight) −43.6% −40.2%
Downside capture 98.9% 99.5%
Beta 0.99 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IJR (slight) 0.55 0.51
Sortino edge IJR (slight) 0.81 0.74
Treynor 0.097 0.108
Calmar edge Tie 0.27 0.26
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.6% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.91 0.46
Information ratio 0.20 0.02
Tracking error 2.4% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: IJR against SPSM, Jul 19, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; VTWO against IWM, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IJR returned more: +484.8% to +409.2%. IJR and VTWO swung about the same: 20.9% and 21.0%. VTWO fell slightly less at its worst: −40.2% to −43.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IJR vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJRVTWOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+484.8%+409.2%IJRPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.6%+10.6%IJR (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+364.9%+315.9%IJRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.9%21.0%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.2%14.5%IJR (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−43.6%−40.2%VTWO (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.7%98.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture98.9%99.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.990.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.991.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.550.51IJR (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.810.74IJR (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0970.108Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.270.26TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPSMIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.6% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.910.46Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +1.9%−0.4% to +0.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.200.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error2.4%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 838 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

46%

By the books each fund has filed, IJR and VTWO hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

46% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IJR VTWO
GLAUKOS 0.61% 0.31%
VIASAT INC 0.55% 0.30%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.52% 0.28%
JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.48% 0.28%
SM ENERGY 0.53% 0.27%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.51% 0.27%
TG THERAPEUTICS 0.46% 0.27%
MAXLINEAR 0.36% 0.26%
PLEXUS CORP 0.35% 0.23%
STONEX GROUP INC 0.35% 0.23%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES 0.35% 0.23%
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP 0.41% 0.23%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IJR
PAYCOM SOFTWARE 0.57%
MATCH GROUP INC 0.57%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.46%
RALLIANT 0.44%
CARMAX INC 0.43%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.43%
ETSY 0.43%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS 0.42%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
Moog Inc 0.36%
10X Genomics Inc 0.35%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.31%
Cytokinetics Inc 0.29%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +17.5% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +17.6% (SPSM) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SPSM +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.06% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.5%
Holdings 642 2002
Net assets, IJR as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $104.6bn $16.6bn

IJR and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-C84177296C

IJR and VTWO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IJR follows S&P SmallCap 600 and VTWO follows Russell 2000 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 46% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IJR returned +17.5% and VTWO +14.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IJR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IJR

IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.6% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 642 positions, with the top ten at 5.3%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJR or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +17.5% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, IJR or VTWO?
Neither: IJR and VTWO both charge 0.06% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJR and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IJR against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijr-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.