Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SCHA vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHA returned +17.8% to VTWO's +14.3%; 58% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SCHA and VTWO

Net assets: $22.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+17.8%
SCHA total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.03%
SCHA expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHA costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.5 points.

SCHA vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCHAVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.8%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high7.9%, high on Jun 30, 20267.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksDow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.06%
Net assets, SCHA as of Aug 31, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026$22.6bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common58%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund10.1%5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 838 weekly returns
SCHA VTWO
Return
Total return edge SCHA (slight) +448.1% +409.2%
Annualized edge SCHA (slight) +11.1% +10.6%
Price return edge SCHA (slight) +337.5% +315.9%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 20.8% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge Tie −40.9% −40.2%
Downside capture 111.0% 99.5%
Beta 1.17 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHA (slight) 0.54 0.51
Sortino edge SCHA (slight) 0.78 0.74
Treynor 0.100 0.108
Calmar edge SCHA (slight) 0.27 0.26
Against the benchmark
Alpha −3.5% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.50 0.46
Information ratio −0.13 0.02
Tracking error 9.9% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: SCHA against IVV, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026; VTWO against IWM, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHA returned slightly more: +448.1% to +409.2%. SCHA and VTWO swung about the same: 20.8% and 21.0%. SCHA and VTWO fell about the same at their worst: −40.9% and −40.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SCHA vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCHAVTWOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+448.1%+409.2%SCHA (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.1%+10.6%SCHA (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+337.5%+315.9%SCHA (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.8%21.0%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.4%14.5%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.9%−40.2%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture113.9%98.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture111.0%99.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.170.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.801.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.540.51SCHA (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.780.74SCHA (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1000.108Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.270.26SCHA (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−3.5% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.500.46Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−8.0% to +1.1%−0.4% to +0.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.130.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.9%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 838 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

58%

By the books each fund has filed, SCHA and VTWO hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

58% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SCHA VTWO
Moog Inc 0.22% 0.36%
Glaukos Corp 0.22% 0.31%
UMB Financial Corp 0.21% 0.32%
Brinker International Inc 0.21% 0.28%
Cytokinetics Inc 0.20% 0.29%
Krystal Biotech Inc 0.20% 0.29%
Jackson Financial Inc 0.20% 0.28%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.19% 0.31%
CareTrust REIT Inc 0.19% 0.29%
Praxis Precision Medicines Inc 0.19% 0.24%
Viasat Inc 0.19% 0.30%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.19% 0.42%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SCHA
Sandisk Corp 4.87%
Lumentum Holdings Inc 1.49%
Revolution Medicines Inc 0.86%
ATI Inc 0.58%
Coeur Mining Inc 0.45%
Guardant Health Inc 0.44%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc 0.36%
MKS Inc 0.36%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
SSR Mining Inc 0.23%
AXT Inc 0.16%
Golar LNG Ltd 0.15%
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp 0.15%
Marex Group Ltd 0.14%
Joby Aviation Inc 0.14%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +17.8% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (IVV) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark +4.1 pts vs IVV +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 6.6% 0.5%
Holdings 1705 2002
Net assets, SCHA as of Aug 31, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $22.6bn $16.6bn

SCHA and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B553DFAB0C

SCHA and VTWO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. SCHA follows Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index and VTWO follows Russell 2000 Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SCHA returned +17.8% and VTWO +14.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.5 points.
  3. Holdings in common (similar). 58% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SCHA

SCHA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,705 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHA or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHA returned +17.8% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, SCHA or VTWO?
SCHA is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHA and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of SCHA and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SCHA against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/scha-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.