Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDA vs SCHA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDA returned +16.4% to SCHA's +17.8%; 44% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDA and SCHA

Net assets on Aug 31, 2026: $9.1bn for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF and $22.6bn for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+16.4%
FNDA total return, 1 year
+17.8%
SCHA total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDA expense ratio
0.03%
SCHA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHA costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.4 points; SCHA is 2.5 times larger.

FNDA vs SCHA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDASCHA
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.4%+17.8%
Drawdown
Below its high6.3%, high on Aug 14, 20267.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQDow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.03%
Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026$9.1bn$22.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common44%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.8%10.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 687 weekly returns
FNDA SCHA
Return
Total return edge FNDA (slight) +244.6% +233.0%
Annualized edge FNDA (slight) +9.8% +9.5%
Price return edge FNDA (slight) +188.8% +177.1%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 20.7% 20.9%
Max drawdown edge SCHA (slight) −43.0% −40.9%
Downside capture 106.7% 111.0%
Beta 1.11 1.17
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FNDA (slight) 0.46 0.45
Sortino edge FNDA (slight) 0.67 0.65
Treynor 0.087 0.100
Calmar edge Tie 0.23 0.23
Against the benchmark
Alpha −4.4% a year −3.5% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.48 −1.50
Information ratio −0.28 −0.13
Tracking error 10.8% 9.9%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDA against VOO, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHA against IVV, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FNDA returned slightly more: +244.6% to +233.0%. FNDA and SCHA swung about the same: 20.7% and 20.9%. SCHA fell slightly less at its worst: −40.9% to −43.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDA vs SCHA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDASCHAEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+244.6%+233.0%FNDA (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.8%+9.5%FNDA (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+188.8%+177.1%FNDA (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.7%20.9%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.4%14.5%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−43.0%−40.9%SCHA (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.9%113.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture106.7%111.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.111.17Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.730.80Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.460.45FNDA (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.670.65FNDA (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0870.100Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.230.23TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−4.4% a year−3.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.48−1.50Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−10.2% to +1.4%−8.0% to +1.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.28−0.13Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error10.8%9.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 687 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

44%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDA and SCHA hold 44% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

44% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDA SCHA
Lumentum Holdings Inc 0.55% 1.49%
MKS Inc 0.32% 0.36%
ATI Inc 0.31% 0.58%
Five Below Inc 0.26% 0.29%
Applied Industrial Technologies Inc 0.29% 0.25%
Moog Inc 0.25% 0.22%
Littelfuse Inc 0.26% 0.22%
EchoStar Corp 0.22% 0.25%
SOUTHSTATE BANK CORP 0.23% 0.21%
Flowserve Corp 0.26% 0.21%
Wintrust Financial Corp 0.21% 0.21%
TTM Technologies Inc 0.21% 0.26%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDA
Twilio Inc 0.34%
Royalty Pharma PLC 0.32%
Coherent Corp 0.32%
FactSet Research Systems Inc 0.31%
Southern Copper Corp 0.30%
DoorDash Inc 0.29%
Entegris Inc 0.29%
Dexcom Inc 0.29%
Only in SCHA
Sandisk Corp 4.87%
Revolution Medicines Inc 0.86%
Guardant Health Inc 0.44%
Samsara Inc 0.32%
BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc 0.30%
Mueller Industries Inc 0.29%
Bridgebio Pharma Inc 0.28%
SiTime Corp 0.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Schwab Schwab
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.4% +17.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +2.7 pts vs VOO +4.1 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 6.6% 6.6%
Holdings 913 1705
Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026 $9.1bn $22.6bn

FNDA and SCHA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-19CAD183AE

FNDA and SCHA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Holdings in common. 44% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
  2. Cost. FNDA charges 0.25% of assets a year and SCHA 0.03%, a gap of 0.22 points.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDA returned +16.4% and SCHA +17.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDA

FNDA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 913 positions, with the top ten at 3.8%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHA

SCHA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,705 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDA or SCHA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDA returned +16.4% and SCHA +17.8%.
Which is cheaper, FNDA or SCHA?
SCHA is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDA and SCHA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of FNDA and 7% of SCHA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDA against SCHA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnda-vs-scha

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.