Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
SCHP vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHP returned −0.8% to XLF's +7.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SCHP and XLFNet assets: $16.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF, and $51.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHP costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points.
| Measure | SCHP | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.8% | +7.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | US TIPS | Financial Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLF as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.5bn | $51.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SCHP and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
SCHP and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHP
SCHP tracks an index of US TIPS. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
XLF
XLF tracks an index of Financials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHP or XLF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHP returned −0.8% and XLF +7.6%.
- Which is cheaper, SCHP or XLF?
- SCHP is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCHP against XLF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schp-vs-xlf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). SCHP against XLF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schp-vs-xlf
[SCHP against XLF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schp-vs-xlf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.