Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

KRE vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, KRE returned +21.2% to SCHP's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about KRE and SCHP

Net assets: $4.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF, and $16.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

At a glance
+21.2%
KRE total return, 1 year
−0.8%
SCHP total return, 1 year
0.35%
KRE expense ratio
0.03%
SCHP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHP costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.0 points.

KRE vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureKRESCHP
Return
Total return, 1 year+21.2%−0.8%
Drawdown
Below its high6.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P Regional Banks Select Industry IndexUS TIPS
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%0.03%
Net assets, KRE as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026$4.2bn$16.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight7%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, KRE and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first KRE SCHP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in KRE
GLACIER BANCORP INC 1.20%
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS 1.17%
BANK OZK 1.17%
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM INC 1.17%
EASTERN BANKSHARES INC 1.16%
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC 1.16%
UNITED BANKSHARES INC 1.16%
VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP 1.15%
Only in SCHP
United States Treasury 4.07%
United States Treasury 4.01%
United States Treasury 4.00%
United States Treasury 3.77%
United States Treasury 3.60%
United States Treasury 3.40%
United States Treasury 3.38%
United States Treasury 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

KRE State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P Regional Banking Tracks an index of US TIPS
Total return, 1 year +21.2% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.6 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.03%
Holdings 167 48
Net assets, KRE as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026 $4.2bn $16.5bn

KRE and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

KRE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
KRE

KRE tracks the S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 167 positions, with the top ten at 11.6%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHP

SCHP tracks an index of US TIPS. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, KRE or SCHP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KRE returned +21.2% and SCHP −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, KRE or SCHP?
SCHP is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KRE against SCHP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/kre-vs-schp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.