Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
RWL vs VTC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RWL returned +20.7% to VTC's −1.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about RWL and VTC
Net assets: $10.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF, and $1.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
VTC costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.6 points.
| Measure | RWL | VTC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +20.7% | −1.9% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index | Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, RWL as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTC as of Sep 30, 2026 | $10.3bn | $1.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 99% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, RWL and VTC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
RWL and VTC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RWL and VTC do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. RWL follows S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index and VTC follows Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 RWL returned +20.7% and VTC −1.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 22.6 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
RWL
RWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +20.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 24.4%.
VTC
VTC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.9% with distributions reinvested, against −1.8% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RWL or VTC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RWL returned +20.7% and VTC −1.9%.
- Which is cheaper, RWL or VTC?
- VTC is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, RWL against VTC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rwl-vs-vtc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). RWL against VTC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rwl-vs-vtc
[RWL against VTC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rwl-vs-vtc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.