RWK vs SMIG: how they differ
RWK and SMIG hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and RWK returned +15.9% over the year. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF.
RWK costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.2 points; SMIG is 1.1 times larger.
| RWK | SMIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, RWK as of Oct 9, 2026 and SMIG as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.3bn | $1.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.9% | +9.7% |
| Holdings in common | 6% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.9% | 42.3% |
| Below its high | 6.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 6.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RWK and SMIG hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
6% in common
On the same fields
RWK and SMIG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RWK in plain words
RWK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 20.9%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
SMIG in plain words
SMIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 35% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 38 positions, with the top ten at 42.3%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RWK or SMIG?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RWK returned +15.9% and SMIG +9.7%.
- Which is cheaper, RWK or SMIG?
- RWK is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $21. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, RWK against SMIG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rwk-vs-smig
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). RWK against SMIG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rwk-vs-smig
[RWK against SMIG (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rwk-vs-smig)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.