FTA vs SMIG: how they differ
FTA and SMIG hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and FTA returned +19.8% over the year. First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF.
FTA costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.1 points.
| FTA | SMIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, FTA as of Oct 9, 2026 and SMIG as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.4bn | $1.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.8% | +9.7% |
| Holdings in common | 4% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 9.5% | 42.3% |
| Below its high | 6.0%, high on Aug 24, 2026 | 6.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTA and SMIG hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
4% in common
On the same fields
FTA and SMIG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTA in plain words
FTA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.58% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 9.5%. It sat 6.0% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
SMIG in plain words
SMIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 35% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 38 positions, with the top ten at 42.3%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTA or SMIG?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTA returned +19.8% and SMIG +9.7%.
- Which is cheaper, FTA or SMIG?
- FTA is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $2. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, FTA against SMIG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-smig
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FTA against SMIG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-smig
[FTA against SMIG (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-smig)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.