ILCV vs RWK: how they differ
ILCV and RWK hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and ILCV returned +22.0% over the year. iShares Morningstar Value ETF and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF.
ILCV costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.1 points.
| ILCV | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.39% |
| Net assets | $1.4bn | $1.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.0% | +15.9% |
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.8% | 20.9% |
| Below its high | 6.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ILCV and RWK hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
1% in common
On the same fields
ILCV and RWK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ILCV in plain words
ILCV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 35.8%.
RWK in plain words
RWK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 20.9%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILCV or RWK?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILCV returned +22.0% and RWK +15.9%.
- Which is cheaper, ILCV or RWK?
- ILCV is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $35. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, ILCV against RWK, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcv-vs-rwk
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). ILCV against RWK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcv-vs-rwk
[ILCV against RWK (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcv-vs-rwk)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.