ILCV vs RWK: how they differ

ILCV and RWK hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and ILCV returned +22.0% over the year. iShares Morningstar Value ETF and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF.

ILCV costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.1 points.

ILCVRWK
Expense ratio0.04%0.39%
Net assets$1.4bn$1.3bn
Total return, 1 year+22.0%+15.9%
Holdings in common1%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.8%20.9%
Below its high6.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+22.0%
ILCV total return, 1 year
+15.9%
RWK total return, 1 year
0.04%
ILCV expense ratio
0.39%
RWK expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ILCV and RWK hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

1% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ILCV RWK
TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.06% 0.86%
COEUR MINING 0.05% 0.10%
EAST WEST BANCORP 0.05% 0.19%
OVINTIV 0.05% 0.39%
PERMIAN RESOURCES CLASS A 0.05% 0.23%
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT REIT 0.04% 0.27%
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP 0.04% 2.75%
TD SYNNEX 0.04% 2.96%
W. P. CAREY REIT 0.04% 0.07%
ALCOA CORP 0.03% 0.48%
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL INC 0.03% 0.56%
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 0.03% 0.65%
Only in ILCV
MICROSOFT 8.53%
APPLE 7.23%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.29%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.95%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.75%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.57%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.56%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.06%
Only in RWK
Albertsons Cos Inc 3.54%
American Airlines Group Inc 2.36%
Molina Healthcare Inc 1.84%
PBF Energy Inc 1.64%
Arrow Electronics Inc 1.55%
HF Sinclair Corp 1.43%
Avnet Inc 1.23%
Lithia Motors Inc 1.22%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +22.0% +15.9%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +4.8 pts −1.3 pts
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.39%
Already in the S&P 500 96.0% 2.4%
Holdings 374 400
Net assets $1.4bn $1.3bn

ILCV and RWK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ILCV in plain words

ILCV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 35.8%.

RWK in plain words

RWK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 20.9%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILCV or RWK?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILCV returned +22.0% and RWK +15.9%.
Which is cheaper, ILCV or RWK?
ILCV is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $35. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ILCV and RWK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of ILCV and 2% of RWK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ILCV against RWK, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcv-vs-rwk

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.