RPV vs RWK: how they differ
RPV and RWK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and RPV returned +22.2% over the year. Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF.
RPV costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points; RPV is 1.3 times larger.
| RPV | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.39% |
| Net assets | $1.7bn | $1.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.2% | +15.9% |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 22.6% | 20.9% |
| Below its high | 4.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | 6.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RPV and RWK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
RPV and RWK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RPV in plain words
RPV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 120 positions, with the top ten at 22.6%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
RWK in plain words
RWK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 20.9%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RPV or RWK?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RPV returned +22.2% and RWK +15.9%.
- Which is cheaper, RPV or RWK?
- RPV is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $4. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, RPV against RWK, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rpv-vs-rwk
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). RPV against RWK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rpv-vs-rwk
[RPV against RWK (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rpv-vs-rwk)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.