Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
REMX vs SLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, REMX returned −19.2% to SLV's +14.9%, and SLV charges 0.50% to REMX's 0.53%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about REMX and SLV
Net assets: $1.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF, and $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Silver Trust.
Pair scorecard
SLV costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 34.1 points; SLV is 17.7 times larger.
| Measure | REMX | SLV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −19.2% | +14.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 75.1%, high on Apr 11, 2011 | |
| Below its high | 53.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Rare earth and critical materials | Silver |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 32.6 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.53% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.5bn | $26.5bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 61% | |
Risk and return
Nov 5, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 833 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: REMX against ACWI, Nov 5, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; SLV against SIVR, Jul 31, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.
SLV returned more: +86.0% to −68.2%. SLV swung less: 31.0% to 35.3%. SLV fell less at its worst: −75.2% to −89.2%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | REMX | SLV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | −68.2% | +86.0% | SLV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | −6.9% | +3.9% | SLV | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −79.7% | +86.0% | SLV | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 35.3% | 31.0% | SLV | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 24.5% | 21.5% | SLV | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −89.2% | −75.2% | SLV | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 129.3% | 100.2% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 133.0% | 100.2% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.43 | 1.00 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.42 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.07 | 0.23 | SLV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.10 | 0.33 | SLV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | −0.018 | 0.107 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | −0.08 | 0.05 | SLV | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | ACWI | SIVR | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −15.8% a year | −0.2% a year | SLV not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −2.33 | −0.92 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −29.0% to −2.5% | −0.6% to +0.2% | SLV includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.42 | −0.19 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 27.8% | 0.8% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 833 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
REMX and SLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
REMX and SLV do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. REMX follows Rare earth and critical materials and SLV follows Silver.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 REMX returned −19.2% and SLV +14.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 34.1 points.
- Size. REMX has $1.5bn in net assets and SLV $26.5bn (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); SLV is 17.7 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
REMX
By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −19.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.6 pts. It sits 75.1% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.
Its expense ratio is 0.50% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
SLV holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are REMX and SLV in the same category?
- REMX is a thematic ETF and SLV is a commodity ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, REMX or SLV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REMX returned −19.2% and SLV +14.9%.
- Which is cheaper, REMX or SLV?
- SLV is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, REMX against SLV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-slv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). REMX against SLV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-slv
[REMX against SLV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-slv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.