IQ

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GLD vs REMX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GLD returned +2.5% to REMX's −19.2%, and GLD charges 0.40% to REMX's 0.53%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GLD and REMX

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $135.8bn for SPDR Gold Shares and $1.5bn for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.

GLD on its own →REMX on its own →
At a glance
+2.5%
GLD total return, 1 year
−19.2%
REMX total return, 1 year
0.40%
GLD expense ratio
0.53%
REMX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GLD costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.7 points; GLD is far larger, $135.8bn against $1.5bn.

GLD vs REMX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGLDREMX
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.5%−19.2%
Drawdown
Below its high24.7%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Below its all-time high75.1%, high on Apr 11, 2011
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGoldRare earth and critical materials
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 32.6 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.53%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$135.8bn$1.5bn
Active share vs the S&P 500100%
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight9%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund61%

Method

Side by side

GLD SPDR Gold Shares REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Thematic ETF
Issuer State Street VanEck
What it is Holds gold Rare earth and critical materials
Total return, 1 year +2.5% −19.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +2.7% (IAU) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs IAU −32.6 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.53%
Holdings not counted 32
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $135.8bn $1.5bn

GLD and REMX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

GLD and REMX flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GLD

Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLD holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.5% with distributions reinvested, against +2.7% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.7% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

REMX

By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −19.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.6 pts. It sits 75.1% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

Questions people ask

Are GLD and REMX in the same category?
GLD is a commodity ETF and REMX is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, GLD or REMX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +2.5% and REMX −19.2%.
Which is cheaper, GLD or REMX?
GLD is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
GLD vs LYTEGLD vs XBIGLD vs IBBAIRR vs GLDREMX vs SLVIAU vs REMXGLDM vs REMXREMX vs USO
Where to next
GLD on its own →REMX on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →REMX dividend history →REMX holdings →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
State Street website ↗
REMX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
REMX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
VanEck website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GLD against REMX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-remx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.