SLV vs SLVP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Over the year SLV returned +7.3% to SLVP's +13.8%, and SLVP charges 0.39% to SLV's 0.50%. Net assets on Oct 14, 2026: $28.9bn for iShares Silver Trust and $822m for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF.

SLVP costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.5 points; SLV is far larger, $28.9bn against $822m.

SLV vs SLVP: Differences, Returns & Fees
SLVSLVP
Expense ratio0.50%0.39%
Net assets$28.9bn$822m
Total return, 1 year+7.3%+13.8%
What it tracksSilverSilver miners
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight5%
Active share vs the S&P 500100%
Holdings datedOct 13, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund72%
Below its high52.4%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Below its all-time high32.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
+7.3%
SLV total return, 1 year
+13.8%
SLVP total return, 1 year
0.50%
SLV expense ratio
0.39%
SLVP expense ratio
Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-4223DB77F4

SLV and SLVP do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. SLV follows Silver and SLVP follows Silver miners.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 14, 2026 SLV returned +7.3% and SLVP +13.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.5 points.
  3. Cost. SLV charges 0.50% of assets a year and SLVP 0.39%, a gap of 0.11 points.

Data as of Oct 14, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

A two-page PDF of this page: the choice, three differences, the trade-offs and the sources. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

SLV
iShares Silver Trust
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Thematic ETF
What it is Holds silver Silver miners
Total return, 1 year +7.3% +13.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +7.6% (SIVR) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.3 pts vs SIVR not available
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.39%
Holdings n/a 38
Net assets $28.9bn $822m

SLV and SLVP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 14, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About SLV

SLV holds silver. Over the year to Oct 14, 2026 it returned +7.3% with distributions reinvested, against +7.6% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 52.4% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 14, 2026.

Its expense ratio is 0.50% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

About SLVP

By weight, 5% of SLVP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 38 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 13, 2026. Over the year to Oct 14, 2026 the fund returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested. It sits 32.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are SLV and SLVP in the same category?
SLV is a commodity ETF and SLVP is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, SLV or SLVP?
In the year to Oct 14, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SLV returned +7.3% and SLVP +13.8%.
Which is cheaper, SLV or SLVP?
SLVP is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SLV against SLVP, data as of Oct 14, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/slv-vs-slvp

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.