RDVY vs RECS: Differences, Returns & Fees
RDVY and RECS hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned +20.2% over the year. Net assets: $25.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF, and $5.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF.
RECS costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.4 points.
| RDVY | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, RDVY as of Oct 9, 2026 and RECS as of Jul 31, 2026 | $25.5bn | $5.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | +14.8% |
| What it tracks | Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| Holdings in common | 22% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 23.2% | 40.4% |
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and RECS hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
22% in common
On the same fields
RDVY and RECS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About RDVY
RDVY tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 23.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About RECS
RECS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 356 positions, with the top ten at 40.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or RECS?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +20.2% and RECS +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, RDVY or RECS?
- RECS is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, RDVY against RECS, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-recs
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). RDVY against RECS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-recs
[RDVY against RECS (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-recs)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.