Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQM vs XLK: how they differ

QQQM and XLK hold 55% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and XLK hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQM and XLK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQMXLK
NVIDIA Corp8.52%14.31%
Apple Inc7.72%12.98%
Microsoft Corp5.89%9.90%
Micron Technology Inc4.90%4.11%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc3.65%4.23%
Broadcom Inc2.75%4.62%
Intel Corp2.24%3.27%
Cisco Systems Inc1.88%2.80%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.69%2.52%
Lam Research Corp1.66%2.46%
Applied Materials Inc1.60%2.38%
Palo Alto Networks Inc1.23%1.81%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQMOnly in XLK
Amazon.com Inc 4.36%ORACLE CORP 1.72%
Alphabet Inc 3.12%INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.45%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.07%SALESFORCE INC 1.31%
Tesla Inc 2.92%AMPHENOL CORP CL A 1.30%
Alphabet Inc 2.90%ARISTA NETWORKS INC 1.29%
Walmart Inc 2.29%DELL TECHNOLOGIES C 0.97%
Costco Wholesale Corp 1.78%SERVICENOW INC 0.89%
Netflix Inc 1.42%CORNING INC 0.84%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

QQQM and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isNasdaq-100Technology
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts+21.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings10674

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 106 positions, with the top ten at 47.1%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or XLK?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +23.0% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or XLK?
QQQM charges 0.15% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQM and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 55% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQM against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQM against XLK, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-xlk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources