Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VONG vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VONG returned +1.1% to XLK's +27.1%; 54% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VONG and XLK

Net assets: $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $125.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
+27.1%
XLK total return, 1 year
0.06%
VONG expense ratio
0.08%
XLK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.0 points; XLK is 2.7 times larger.

VONG vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVONGXLK
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.1%+27.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 20265.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Growth IndexTechnology Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.06%0.08%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$47.1bn$127.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common54%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.6%64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 838 weekly returns
VONG XLK
Return
Total return edge XLK +1,017.5% +1,858.8%
Annualized edge XLK +16.2% +20.3%
Price return edge XLK +840.0% +1,491.2%
Risk
Volatility edge VONG 17.9% 20.2%
Max drawdown edge Tie −32.5% −32.6%
Downside capture 99.8% 113.0%
Beta 0.99 1.15
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XLK 0.84 0.94
Sortino edge XLK 1.25 1.43
Treynor 0.151 0.094
Calmar edge XLK 0.50 0.62
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.2% a year +1.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.76 0.67
Information ratio 0.11 0.22
Tracking error 1.0% 12.6%

Each against its own benchmark: VONG against IWF, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; XLK against SPY, Dec 31, 1998 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

XLK returned more: +1,858.8% to +1,017.5%. VONG swung less: 17.9% to 20.2%. VONG and XLK fell about the same at their worst: −32.5% and −32.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: VONG vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVONGXLKEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,017.5%+1,858.8%XLKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.2%+20.3%XLKTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+840.0%+1,491.2%XLKPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.9%20.2%VONGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.0%13.3%VONG (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.5%−32.6%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.9%138.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.8%113.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.991.15Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.73Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.840.94XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.251.43XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1510.094Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.500.62XLKAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWFSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.2% a year+1.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.760.67Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.3% to +0.7%−3.0% to +6.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.110.22Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.0%12.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 838 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

54%

By the books each fund has filed, VONG and XLK hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

54% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VONG XLK
NVIDIA Corp 15.63% 15.22%
Apple Inc 7.65% 14.62%
Microsoft Corp 5.59% 11.38%
Broadcom Inc 4.79% 4.70%
Micron Technology Inc 3.52% 4.02%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.92% 4.78%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.22% 2.67%
Lam Research Corp 1.21% 1.76%
Applied Materials Inc 1.19% 1.84%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.94% 1.91%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.78% 1.59%
KLA Corp 0.75% 1.17%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VONG
Alphabet Inc 5.88%
Alphabet Inc 4.75%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.83%
Tesla Inc 3.04%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.71%
Visa Inc 1.69%
Mastercard Inc 1.31%
Caterpillar Inc 1.08%
Only in XLK
INTEL CORP 2.72%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.56%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.38%
SALESFORCE INC 1.15%
QUALCOMM INC 1.15%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS 0.88%
ACCENTURE PLC CL A 0.84%
SYNOPSYS INC 0.53%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Tracks an index of Technology
Total return, 1 year +1.1% +27.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +0.9% (IWF) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark +0.2 pts vs IWF +13.5 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.06% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 95.5% 99.9%
Holdings 373 76
Net assets, VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLK as of Oct 27, 2026 $47.1bn $125.0bn

VONG and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-EE9F90DE8D

VONG and XLK do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and XLK follows Technology Select Sector Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 VONG returned +1.1% and XLK +27.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 26.0 points.
  3. Number of holdings. VONG holds 373 positions and XLK holds 76.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

XLK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLK

XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VONG or XLK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +1.1% and XLK +27.1%.
Which is cheaper, VONG or XLK?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VONG and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VONG against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vong-vs-xlk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.