Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FTEC vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTEC returned +25.0% to QQQM's +15.2%; 52% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTEC and QQQM

Net assets: $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF, and $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+25.0%
FTEC total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.08%
FTEC expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FTEC costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.8 points.

FTEC vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.0%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Oct 6, 20264.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.15%
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026$22.1bn$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common52%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund62.2%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returns
FTEC QQQM
Return
Total return edge FTEC +214.4% +157.2%
Annualized edge FTEC +21.0% +17.0%
Price return edge FTEC +202.2% +147.9%
Risk
Volatility edge QQQM 23.8% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge FTEC (slight) −34.1% −35.0%
Downside capture 100.0% 99.8%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTEC 0.78 0.70
Sortino edge FTEC 1.21 1.07
Treynor 0.199 0.147
Calmar edge FTEC 0.62 0.49
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.62
Information ratio −0.19 0.10
Tracking error 0.7% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: FTEC against VGT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FTEC returned more: +214.4% to +157.2%. QQQM swung less: 21.0% to 23.8%. FTEC fell slightly less at its worst: −34.1% to −35.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTEC vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECQQQMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+214.4%+157.2%FTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+21.0%+17.0%FTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+202.2%+147.9%FTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.8%21.0%QQQMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.3%13.6%QQQMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.1%−35.0%FTEC (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.7%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.780.70FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.211.07FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1990.147Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.620.49FTECAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVGTQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.5% to +0.2%−0.2% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.190.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

52%

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and QQQM hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

52% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTEC QQQM
NVIDIA Corp 17.09% 8.17%
Apple Inc 16.21% 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 10.93% 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 3.82% 4.50%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.18% 3.93%
Broadcom Inc 4.20% 2.53%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.92% 1.89%
Intel Corp 1.65% 2.12%
Applied Materials Inc 1.69% 1.35%
Lam Research Corp 1.54% 1.29%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.17% 1.41%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.13% 1.96%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTEC
Oracle Corp 0.90%
International Business Machines Corp 0.88%
Amphenol Corp 0.85%
Arista Networks Inc 0.84%
Salesforce Inc 0.65%
Dell Technologies Inc 0.59%
ServiceNow Inc 0.49%
Corning Inc 0.49%
Only in QQQM
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.93%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.87%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.74%
Alphabet Inc 2.72%
Walmart Inc 2.49%
Costco Wholesale Corp 1.89%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Information Technology Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +25.0% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +24.7% (VGT) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs VGT 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 95.7%
Holdings 281 105
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 $22.1bn $110.4bn

FTEC and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-3E2F01AB03

FTEC and QQQM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FTEC follows MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTEC returned +25.0% and QQQM +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.8 points.
  3. Holdings in common (similar). 52% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTEC

FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +25.0% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or QQQM?
FTEC is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FTEC and 96% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTEC against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.