Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GARP vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GARP returned +18.0% to XLK's +27.1%; 45% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GARP and XLK

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.6bn for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and $125.0bn for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+18.0%
GARP total return, 1 year
+27.1%
XLK total return, 1 year
0.15%
GARP expense ratio
0.08%
XLK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLK costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.1 points; XLK is far larger, $125.0bn against $3.6bn.

GARP vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGARPXLK
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.0%+27.1%
Drawdown
Below its high7.0%, high on Oct 6, 20265.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Quality GARP Select IndexTechnology Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.6bn$125.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common45%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund43.5%64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jan 24, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 352 weekly returns
GARP XLK
Return
Total return edge XLK +232.4% +297.4%
Annualized edge XLK +19.4% +22.6%
Price return edge XLK +215.4% +276.1%
Risk
Volatility edge GARP 22.3% 25.2%
Max drawdown edge GARP (slight) −30.1% −32.6%
Downside capture 109.0% 113.0%
Beta 1.10 1.15
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XLK (slight) 0.78 0.82
Sortino edge XLK (slight) 1.16 1.25
Treynor 0.157 0.094
Calmar edge XLK (slight) 0.65 0.69
Against the benchmark
Alpha +3.4% a year +1.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.15 0.67
Information ratio 0.59 0.22
Tracking error 7.9% 12.6%

Each against its own benchmark: GARP against PBUS, Jan 24, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; XLK against SPY, Dec 31, 1998 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

XLK returned more: +297.4% to +232.4%. GARP swung less: 22.3% to 25.2%. GARP fell slightly less at its worst: −30.1% to −32.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GARP vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGARPXLKEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+232.4%+297.4%XLKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+19.4%+22.6%XLKTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+215.4%+276.1%XLKPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.3%25.2%GARPSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.9%16.5%GARP (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−30.1%−32.6%GARP (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture133.9%138.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture109.0%113.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.101.15Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.880.73Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.780.82XLK (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.161.25XLK (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1570.094Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.650.69XLK (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+3.4% a year+1.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.150.67Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +9.2%−3.0% to +6.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.590.22Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.9%12.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 352 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

45%

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and XLK hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

45% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GARP XLK
MICROSOFT 5.67% 11.38%
APPLE 5.66% 14.62%
NVIDIA 5.18% 15.22%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 4.61% 4.02%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 2.86% 2.67%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.01% 4.78%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.07% 1.84%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.81% 2.72%
LAM RESEARCH 3.31% 1.76%
BROADCOM INC 1.70% 4.70%
KLA 3.09% 1.17%
ARISTA NETWORKS 1.32% 1.14%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GARP
VISA CLASS A 5.13%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.72%
CATERPILLAR INC 3.29%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.24%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.12%
MERCADOLIBRE 1.86%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP 1.83%
Only in XLK
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.56%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 1.65%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.38%
ANALOG DEVICES INC 1.21%
SALESFORCE INC 1.15%
QUALCOMM INC 1.15%
SANDISK CORP 1.11%
ACCENTURE PLC CL A 0.84%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Tracks an index of Technology
Total return, 1 year +18.0% +27.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark +4.7 pts vs PBUS +13.5 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 94.4% 99.9%
Holdings 131 76
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.6bn $125.0bn

GARP and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E182459362

GARP and XLK do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. GARP follows MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index and XLK follows Technology Select Sector Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 45% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 GARP returned +18.0% and XLK +27.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GARP and XLK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GARP

GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.5%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLK

XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or XLK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +18.0% and XLK +27.1%.
Which is cheaper, GARP or XLK?
XLK is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GARP against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/garp-vs-xlk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.