Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PVAL vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PVAL returned +26.6% to SCHG's +6.8%; 25% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PVAL and SCHG

Net assets on Aug 31, 2026: $14.1bn for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF and $63.0bn for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+26.6%
PVAL total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.55%
PVAL expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.8 points; SCHG is 4.5 times larger.

PVAL vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePVALSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+26.6%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.55%0.04%
Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026$14.1bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common25%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.8%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 4, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 281 weekly returns
PVAL SCHG
Return
Total return edge PVAL +123.6% +107.7%
Annualized edge PVAL (slight) +16.1% +14.5%
Price return edge PVAL (slight) +111.2% +102.5%
Risk
Volatility edge PVAL 14.9% 20.9%
Max drawdown edge PVAL −15.6% −34.2%
Downside capture 94.0% 108.1%
Beta 1.01 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PVAL 0.83 0.58
Sortino edge PVAL 1.23 0.88
Treynor 0.123 0.138
Calmar edge PVAL 1.03 0.42
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.5% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 2.66 0.65
Information ratio 1.16 0.40
Tracking error 3.9% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: PVAL against IWD, Jun 4, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

PVAL returned more: +123.6% to +107.7%. PVAL swung less: 14.9% to 20.9%. PVAL fell less at its worst: −15.6% to −34.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PVAL vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePVALSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+123.6%+107.7%PVALPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.1%+14.5%PVAL (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+111.2%+102.5%PVAL (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.9%20.9%PVALSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.1%13.7%PVALLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−15.6%−34.2%PVALDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture105.1%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture94.0%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.011.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.930.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.830.58PVALReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.230.88PVALReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1230.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.030.42PVALAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.5% a year+0.8% a yearSCHG not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat2.660.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range+1.2% to +7.8%−1.7% to +3.4%SCHG includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio1.160.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.9%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 281 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

25%

By the books each fund has filed, PVAL and SCHG hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

25% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PVAL SCHG
MICROSOFT CORP 9.27% 7.52%
APPLE INC 6.70% 9.29%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.71% 5.07%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.23% 1.36%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.32% 2.37%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC 2.48% 0.88%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC 2.07% 0.53%
MCKESSON CORP 1.72% 0.41%
T-MOBILE US INC 0.91% 0.32%
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC 1.61% 0.31%
UNITED RENTALS INC 1.05% 0.25%
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT INC 1.38% 0.24%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PVAL
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.77%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) 3.25%
CITIGROUP INC 3.25%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 3.13%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.95%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.88%
ALLSTATE CORP (THE) 2.86%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 2.70%
Only in SCHG
NVIDIA Corp 10.67%
Alphabet Inc 3.97%
Broadcom Inc 3.50%
Alphabet Inc 3.16%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.51%
Visa Inc 2.43%
Tesla Inc 2.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Putnam Schwab
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +26.6% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −0.9 pts vs IWD −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 91.4% 94.7%
Holdings 44 192
Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026 $14.1bn $63.0bn

PVAL and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B2CA448C62

PVAL and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. PVAL follows No index, actively managed and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 25% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PVAL returned +26.6% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 19.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PVAL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PVAL or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PVAL returned +26.6% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, PVAL or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PVAL and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of PVAL and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PVAL against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pval-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.