Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PVAL vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PVAL returned +26.6% to QQQM's +15.2%; 24% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PVAL and QQQM

Net assets: $14.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF, and $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+26.6%
PVAL total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.55%
PVAL expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.4 points.

PVAL vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePVALQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+26.6%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.55%0.15%
Net assets, PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026$14.1bn$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common24%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.8%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 4, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 281 weekly returns
PVAL QQQM
Return
Total return edge PVAL (slight) +123.6% +117.5%
Annualized edge PVAL (slight) +16.1% +15.5%
Price return edge Tie +111.2% +110.3%
Risk
Volatility edge PVAL 14.9% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge PVAL −15.6% −35.0%
Downside capture 94.0% 99.8%
Beta 1.01 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PVAL 0.83 0.62
Sortino edge PVAL 1.23 0.93
Treynor 0.123 0.147
Calmar edge PVAL 1.03 0.44
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.5% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 2.66 0.62
Information ratio 1.16 0.10
Tracking error 3.9% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: PVAL against IWD, Jun 4, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

PVAL returned slightly more: +123.6% to +117.5%. PVAL swung less: 14.9% to 21.0%. PVAL fell less at its worst: −15.6% to −35.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PVAL vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePVALQQQMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+123.6%+117.5%PVAL (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.1%+15.5%PVAL (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+111.2%+110.3%TiePrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.9%21.0%PVALSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.1%13.9%PVALLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−15.6%−35.0%PVALDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture105.1%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture94.0%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.011.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.931.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.830.62PVALReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.230.93PVALReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1230.147Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.030.44PVALAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.5% a year+0.1% a yearQQQM not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat2.660.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range+1.2% to +7.8%−0.2% to +0.4%QQQM includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio1.160.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.9%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 281 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

24%

By the books each fund has filed, PVAL and QQQM hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

24% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PVAL QQQM
APPLE INC 6.70% 7.88%
MICROSOFT CORP 9.27% 6.14%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.71% 4.25%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.88% 1.89%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.32% 3.93%
WALMART INC 1.16% 2.49%
T-MOBILE US INC 0.91% 0.68%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 1.60% 0.65%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC 2.07% 0.57%
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC 1.61% 0.35%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC 1.28% 0.30%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PVAL
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.77%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) 3.25%
CITIGROUP INC 3.25%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 3.13%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.95%
ALLSTATE CORP (THE) 2.86%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 2.70%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 2.64%
Only in QQQM
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.93%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.87%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.74%
Alphabet Inc 2.72%
Broadcom Inc 2.53%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +26.6% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark −0.9 pts vs IWD 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 91.4% 95.7%
Holdings 44 105
Net assets, PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 $14.1bn $110.4bn

PVAL and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-07924A0C7D

PVAL and QQQM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. PVAL follows No index, actively managed and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 24% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PVAL returned +26.6% and QQQM +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PVAL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PVAL or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PVAL returned +26.6% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, PVAL or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. That is about $40 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PVAL and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of PVAL and 96% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PVAL against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pval-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.