Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQM vs SPHD: how they differ

QQQM and SPHD hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned more over the year.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and SPHD hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQM and SPHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQMSPHD
PepsiCo Inc0.84%1.97%
Comcast Corp0.40%2.62%
Honeywell International Inc0.28%1.66%
Exelon Corp0.20%1.50%
Paychex Inc0.18%2.13%
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio0.13%0.26%
Kraft Heinz Co/The0.13%2.90%
CASH COLLATERAL0.01%0.03%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQMOnly in SPHD
NVIDIA Corp 8.52%Verizon Communications Inc 3.39%
Apple Inc 7.72%Pfizer Inc 3.38%
Microsoft Corp 5.89%General Mills Inc 2.96%
Micron Technology Inc 4.90%VICI Properties Inc 2.83%
Amazon.com Inc 4.36%AT&T Inc 2.70%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.65%Altria Group Inc 2.55%
Alphabet Inc 3.12%Crown Castle Inc 2.43%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.07%Healthpeak Properties Inc 2.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

QQQM and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoInvesco
What it isNasdaq-100S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts−8.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.30%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%95.7%
Holdings10656

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 106 positions, with the top ten at 47.1%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 28.1%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or SPHD?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +23.0% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or SPHD?
QQQM charges 0.15% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQM and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQM against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQM against SPHD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-sphd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources