Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
SCHG vs SCHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHG returned +6.8% to SCHV's +20.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SCHG and SCHV
Net assets on Aug 31, 2026: $63.0bn for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and $15.7bn for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.04% a year; their one-year returns differ by 14.0 points; SCHG is 4.0 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | SCHG | SCHV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.8% | +20.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026 | $63.0bn | $15.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.0% | 20.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 879 weekly returns · each against IVVSCHG returned more: +1,156.7% to +533.9%. SCHV swung less: 15.5% to 18.5%. SCHG and SCHV fell about the same at their worst: −34.2% and −34.3%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | SCHG | SCHV | IVV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +1,156.7% | +533.9% | +833.2% | SCHG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.2% | +11.5% | +14.1% | SCHG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +988.8% | +310.6% | +586.5% | SCHG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 18.5% | 15.5% | 16.1% | SCHV | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.5% | 10.9% | 11.1% | SCHV | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −34.2% | −34.3% | −31.8% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 121.1% | 80.9% | 100.0% | SCHG | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 108.1% | 91.7% | 100.0% | SCHV | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 1.10 | 0.91 | 1.00 | SCHV lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.92 | 0.89 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.82 | 0.68 | 0.81 | SCHG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.22 | 0.97 | 1.17 | SCHG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.138 | 0.117 | 0.130 | SCHG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.44 | SCHG | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | IVV | IVV | IVV | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.8% a year | −1.2% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.65 | −0.92 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −1.7% to +3.4% | −3.7% to +1.3% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | 0.40 | −0.44 | SCHG | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 5.5% | 5.4% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 879 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and SCHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
SCHG and SCHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG and SCHV do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index and SCHV follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SCHG returned +6.8% and SCHV +20.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.0 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SCHV
SCHV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 555 positions, with the top ten at 20.3%.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCHG against SCHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-schv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). SCHG against SCHV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-schv
[SCHG against SCHV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-schv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.