Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to SCHG's +6.8%; 26% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and SCHG

Net assets on Aug 31, 2026: $27.6bn for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and $63.0bn for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.1 points; SCHG is 2.3 times larger.

FNDX vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.04%
Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026$27.6bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common26%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 687 weekly returns
FNDX SCHG
Return
Total return edge SCHG +418.7% +669.0%
Annualized edge SCHG +13.3% +16.7%
Price return edge SCHG +298.9% +592.1%
Risk
Volatility edge FNDX 15.9% 18.8%
Max drawdown edge SCHG (slight) −35.2% −34.2%
Downside capture 92.1% 108.1%
Beta 0.93 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHG (slight) 0.74 0.81
Sortino edge SCHG 1.05 1.21
Treynor 0.128 0.138
Calmar edge SCHG 0.38 0.49
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.4% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.28 0.65
Information ratio −0.10 0.40
Tracking error 5.3% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDX against IWB, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHG returned more: +669.0% to +418.7%. FNDX swung less: 15.9% to 18.8%. SCHG fell slightly less at its worst: −34.2% to −35.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDX vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+418.7%+669.0%SCHGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.3%+16.7%SCHGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+298.9%+592.1%SCHGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility15.9%18.8%FNDXSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.2%12.6%FNDXLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.2%−34.2%SCHG (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture86.4%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture92.1%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.931.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.900.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.740.81SCHG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.051.21SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1280.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.380.49SCHGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.4% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.280.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +3.2%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.100.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.3%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 687 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

26%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and SCHG hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

26% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX SCHG
Apple Inc 4.46% 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 2.82% 7.52%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80% 5.07%
Alphabet Inc 1.78% 3.97%
Alphabet Inc 1.41% 3.16%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.45% 1.36%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.21% 2.51%
NVIDIA Corp 0.63% 10.67%
Costco Wholesale Corp 0.56% 1.61%
Broadcom Inc 0.48% 3.50%
Visa Inc 0.41% 2.43%
Phillips 66 0.58% 0.38%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
Intel Corp 1.42%
Johnson & Johnson 1.06%
Bank of America Corp 1.01%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.01%
Only in SCHG
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.65%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.91%
Snowflake Inc 0.44%
Cloudflare Inc 0.38%
DoorDash Inc 0.34%
AppLovin Corp 0.32%
Robinhood Markets Inc 0.32%
Datadog Inc 0.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Schwab Schwab
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +23.9% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 88.4% 94.7%
Holdings 731 192
Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026 $27.6bn $63.0bn

FNDX and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6ACF064DD0

FNDX and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 26% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 17.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FNDX and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.