Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to MAGS's +5.8%; 12% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and MAGS
Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
Pair scorecard
FNDX costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.1 points.
| Measure | FNDX | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +5.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 | $27.6bn | $5.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 12% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | 29.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and MAGS hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
12% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or MAGS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and MAGS +5.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or MAGS?
- FNDX is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-mags
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against MAGS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-mags
[FNDX against MAGS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-mags)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.