Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWD vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWD returned +27.5% to MAGS's +5.8%; 11% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWD and MAGS

Net assets: $83.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF, and $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+27.5%
IWD total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.18%
IWD expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWD costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.7 points; IWD is 15.1 times larger.

IWD vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWDMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+27.5%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Value IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.30%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$83.0bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common11%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.6%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

11%

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and MAGS hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

11% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWD MAGS
APPLE 6.08% 3.49%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.95% 3.48%
MICROSOFT 5.21% 3.07%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 0.66% 3.04%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWD
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.67%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.37%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.96%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.71%
WALMART 1.26%
ABBVIE 1.23%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.16%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.13%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 value Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +27.5% +5.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.7% (VONV) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VONV not measured
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 90.0% 22.5%
Holdings 871 8
Net assets, IWD as of Oct 27, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 $83.0bn $5.5bn

IWD and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWD and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWD

IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested, against +27.7% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 29.6%.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.5% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, IWD or MAGS?
IWD is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWD and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWD against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.