Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWF vs PVAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to PVAL's +26.6%; 16% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWF and PVAL
Net assets: $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $14.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWF costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.7 points.
| Measure | IWF | PVAL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.9% | +26.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.55% |
| Net assets, IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 and PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 | $124.7bn | $14.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 16% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | 42.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and PVAL hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
16% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWF and PVAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF and PVAL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and PVAL follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 16% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWF returned +0.9% and PVAL +26.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 25.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
PVAL
PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or PVAL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and PVAL +26.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or PVAL?
- IWF is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against PVAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-pval
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWF against PVAL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-pval
[IWF against PVAL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-pval)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.