Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PULS vs XBI: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to XBI's +41.2%, and PULS charges 0.15% to XBI's 0.35%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PULS and XBI
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and $10.3bn for State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 37.2 points; PULS is 1.9 times larger.
| Measure | PULS | XBI |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +41.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 8.9%, high on Feb 8, 2021 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Biotech |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $19.8bn | $10.3bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 98% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 13% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 18% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PULS and XBI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PULS and XBI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
XBI
By weight, 13% of XBI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 18% of the fund across 165 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +41.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 8.9% below its all-time high of Feb 8, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Are PULS and XBI in the same category?
- PULS is a bond ETF and XBI is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or XBI?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and XBI +41.2%.
- Which is cheaper, PULS or XBI?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PULS against XBI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xbi
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PULS against XBI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xbi
[PULS against XBI (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xbi)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.