Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to VTWO's +14.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and VTWO

Net assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.3 points.

PULS vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high7.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026$19.8bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and VTWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS VTWO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
Moog Inc 0.36%
10X Genomics Inc 0.35%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.31%
Glaukos Corp 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PGIM Vanguard
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.06%
Holdings 553 2002
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $19.8bn $16.6bn

PULS and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.