Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PULS vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to VB's +14.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PULS and VBNet assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $76.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
VB costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.4 points.
| Measure | PULS | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +14.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Morningstar US Small Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VB as of Sep 30, 2026 | $19.8bn | $76.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 22% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 5.9% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PULS and VB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PULS and VB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
VB
VB tracks an index of Small-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,303 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and VB +14.4%.
- Which is cheaper, PULS or VB?
- VB is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PULS against VB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PULS against VB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vb
[PULS against VB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.