Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWC vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWC returned +16.5% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWC and PULS
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.2bn for iShares Micro-Cap ETF and $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.5 points; PULS is 16.5 times larger.
| Measure | IWC | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.5% | +4.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell Microcap Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.2bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 92% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 5.9% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWC and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWC and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWC or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +16.5% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, IWC or PULS?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWC against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWC against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-puls
[IWC against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.