Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWC vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWC returned +16.5% to SHV's +3.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWC and SHV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.2bn for iShares Micro-Cap ETF and $21.7bn for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+16.5%
IWC total return, 1 year
+3.6%
SHV total return, 1 year
0.60%
IWC expense ratio
0.15%
SHV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SHV costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.9 points; SHV is 18.1 times larger.

IWC vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWCSHV
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.5%+3.6%
Drawdown
Below its high9.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell Microcap IndexICE Short US Treasury Securities Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$1.2bn$21.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWC and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWC SHV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWC
CAREDX 0.88%
PENGUIN SOLUTIONS INC 0.73%
NURIX THERAPEUTICS 0.63%
SELLAS LIFE SCIENCES GROUP INC 0.60%
VIRIDIAN THERAPEUTICS ORS 0.59%
OUSTER 0.53%
INTERFACE 0.52%
STRIVE INC CLASS A 0.50%
Only in SHV
TREASURY BILL 4.98%
TREASURY BILL 4.17%
TREASURY BILL 3.90%
TREASURY BILL 3.72%
TREASURY BILL 3.58%
TREASURY BILL 3.48%
TREASURY BILL 3.35%
TREASURY BILL 3.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell Microcap Tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year +16.5% +3.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +3.2 pts vs IWV not measured
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.15%
Holdings 1365 66
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.2bn $21.7bn

IWC and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWC and SHV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWC

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SHV

SHV tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWC or SHV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +16.5% and SHV +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, IWC or SHV?
SHV is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWC against SHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-shv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.