Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWM vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to SHV's +3.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWM and SHV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF and $21.7bn for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
+3.6%
SHV total return, 1 year
0.19%
IWM expense ratio
0.15%
SHV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SHV costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.5 points; IWM is 3.5 times larger.

IWM vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMSHV
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%+3.6%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexICE Short US Treasury Securities Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$75.5bn$21.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWM and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWM SHV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
GLAUKOS 0.35%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%
SM ENERGY 0.32%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
Only in SHV
TREASURY BILL 4.98%
TREASURY BILL 4.17%
TREASURY BILL 3.90%
TREASURY BILL 3.72%
TREASURY BILL 3.58%
TREASURY BILL 3.48%
TREASURY BILL 3.35%
TREASURY BILL 3.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year +14.1% +3.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (VTWO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWO not measured
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.15%
Holdings 1977 66
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $75.5bn $21.7bn

IWM and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWM and SHV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SHV

SHV tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or SHV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and SHV +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, IWM or SHV?
SHV is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWM against SHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-shv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.