Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWM vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to VUSB's +3.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWM and VUSB

Net assets: $75.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 ETF, and $9.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
+3.5%
VUSB total return, 1 year
0.19%
IWM expense ratio
0.10%
VUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VUSB costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.6 points; IWM is 7.9 times larger.

IWM vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMVUSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%+3.5%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.10%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$78.0bn$9.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWM and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWM VUSB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
GLAUKOS 0.35%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%
SM ENERGY 0.32%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
Only in VUSB
United States Treasury Bill 2.39%
United States Treasury Bill 2.35%
MKTLIQ 2.00%
Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.89%
PNC Financial Services Group Inc 0.53%
National Bank of Canada 0.53%
Citizens Bank NA/Providence RI 0.48%
US Bancorp 0.47%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +14.1% +3.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (VTWO) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWO +4.9 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.10%
Holdings 1977 1344
Net assets, IWM as of Oct 27, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026 $75.5bn $9.9bn

IWM and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VUSB

VUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or VUSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and VUSB +3.5%.
Which is cheaper, IWM or VUSB?
VUSB is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWM against VUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-vusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.