Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWM vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to MINT's +4.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWM and MINT
Net assets: $75.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.
Pair scorecard
IWM costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.9 points.
| Measure | IWM | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.1% | +4.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 2000 Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.36% |
| Net assets, IWM as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 | $75.5bn | $16.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 3.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWM and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWM and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWM
IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWM or MINT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and MINT +4.2%.
- Which is cheaper, IWM or MINT?
- IWM is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWM against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-mint
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWM against MINT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-mint
[IWM against MINT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-mint)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.