Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VTWO vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VTWO returned +14.3% to VUSB's +3.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VTWO and VUSB

Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $16.6bn for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF and $9.9bn for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
+3.5%
VUSB total return, 1 year
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio
0.10%
VUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points; VTWO is 1.7 times larger.

VTWO vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVTWOVUSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.3%+3.5%
Drawdown
Below its high7.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.06%0.10%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$16.6bn$9.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, VTWO and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VTWO VUSB
MKTLIQ 0.05% 2.00%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
Moog Inc 0.36%
10X Genomics Inc 0.35%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.31%
Glaukos Corp 0.31%
Only in VUSB
United States Treasury Bill 2.39%
United States Treasury Bill 2.35%
Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.89%
PNC Financial Services Group Inc 0.53%
National Bank of Canada 0.53%
Citizens Bank NA/Providence RI 0.48%
US Bancorp 0.47%
Charles Schwab Corp 0.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +14.3% +3.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.1% (IWM) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark +0.2 pts vs IWM +4.9 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.06% 0.10%
Holdings 2002 1344
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 $16.6bn $9.9bn

VTWO and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VUSB

VUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VTWO or VUSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VTWO returned +14.3% and VUSB +3.5%.
Which is cheaper, VTWO or VUSB?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VTWO against VUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vtwo-vs-vusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.