Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PSC vs SCHA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PSC returned +21.0% to SCHA's +17.8%; 28% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PSC and SCHA

Net assets: $2.7bn on Oct 26, 2026 for Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF, and $22.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+21.0%
PSC total return, 1 year
+17.8%
SCHA total return, 1 year
0.38%
PSC expense ratio
0.03%
SCHA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHA costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.2 points.

PSC vs SCHA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePSCSCHA
Return
Total return, 1 year+21.0%+17.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.38%0.03%
Net assets, PSC as of Oct 26, 2026 and SCHA as of Aug 31, 2026$2.7bn$22.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common28%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.2%10.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 30, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 525 weekly returns
PSC SCHA
Return
Total return edge PSC +204.6% +159.7%
Annualized edge PSC +11.7% +9.9%
Price return edge PSC +170.5% +126.1%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHA (slight) 23.2% 22.5%
Max drawdown edge SCHA (slight) −44.9% −40.9%
Downside capture 91.9% 111.0%
Beta 0.95 1.17
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PSC 0.49 0.42
Sortino edge PSC 0.70 0.61
Treynor 0.118 0.100
Calmar edge PSC (slight) 0.26 0.24
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.4% a year −3.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.96 −1.50
Information ratio 0.24 −0.13
Tracking error 8.1% 9.9%

Each against its own benchmark: PSC against IWM, Sep 30, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHA against IVV, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

PSC returned more: +204.6% to +159.7%. SCHA swung slightly less: 22.5% to 23.2%. SCHA fell slightly less at its worst: −40.9% to −44.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PSC vs SCHA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePSCSCHAEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+204.6%+159.7%PSCPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.7%+9.9%PSCTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+170.5%+126.1%PSCPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.2%22.5%SCHA (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.0%15.6%SCHA (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−44.9%−40.9%SCHA (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture84.9%113.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture91.9%111.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.951.17Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.880.80Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.490.42PSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.700.61PSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1180.100Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.260.24PSC (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWMIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.4% a year−3.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.96−1.50Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.5% to +7.4%−8.0% to +1.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.24−0.13Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error8.1%9.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 525 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

28%

By the books each fund has filed, PSC and SCHA hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

28% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PSC SCHA
Coeur Mining Inc 0.44% 0.45%
Guardant Health Inc 0.87% 0.44%
Sterling Infrastructure Inc 1.17% 0.30%
Hecla Mining Co 0.42% 0.28%
Bridgebio Pharma Inc 0.60% 0.28%
TTM Technologies Inc 1.03% 0.26%
Nextpower Inc 0.63% 0.26%
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.45% 0.24%
American Healthcare REIT Inc 0.61% 0.22%
Moog Inc 0.46% 0.22%
Advanced Energy Industries Inc 0.62% 0.22%
Sanmina Corp 0.64% 0.22%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PSC
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.38%
Fabrinet 0.70%
Chart Industries Inc 0.61%
Pagseguro Digital Ltd 0.42%
Marex Group PLC 0.39%
IMAX Corp 0.36%
Scorpio Tankers Inc 0.34%
Pagaya Technologies Ltd 0.32%
Only in SCHA
Sandisk Corp 4.87%
Lumentum Holdings Inc 1.49%
Revolution Medicines Inc 0.86%
ATI Inc 0.58%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc 0.36%
MKS Inc 0.36%
Samsara Inc 0.32%
Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc 0.32%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +21.0% +17.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.1% (IWM) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +6.9 pts vs IWM +4.1 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.38% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 6.6%
Holdings 506 1705
Net assets, PSC as of Oct 26, 2026 and SCHA as of Aug 31, 2026 $2.7bn $22.6bn

PSC and SCHA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-7CFBD9BBC5

PSC and SCHA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. PSC follows No index, actively managed and SCHA follows Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 28% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PSC returned +21.0% and SCHA +17.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PSC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PSC

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index.

PSC is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 11.2%.

SCHA

SCHA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,705 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PSC or SCHA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PSC returned +21.0% and SCHA +17.8%.
Which is cheaper, PSC or SCHA?
SCHA is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PSC and SCHA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of PSC and 7% of SCHA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PSC against SCHA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/psc-vs-scha

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.