Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDA vs PSC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDA returned +16.4% to PSC's +21.0%; 25% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDA and PSC

Net assets: $9.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF, and $2.7bn on Oct 26, 2026 for Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+16.4%
FNDA total return, 1 year
+21.0%
PSC total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDA expense ratio
0.38%
PSC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FNDA costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.6 points.

FNDA vs PSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDAPSC
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.4%+21.0%
Drawdown
Below its high6.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.38%
Net assets, FNDA as of Aug 31, 2026 and PSC as of Oct 26, 2026$9.1bn$2.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common25%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.8%11.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 30, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 525 weekly returns
FNDA PSC
Return
Total return edge PSC +164.4% +204.6%
Annualized edge PSC +10.1% +11.7%
Price return edge PSC +129.1% +170.5%
Risk
Volatility edge FNDA (slight) 22.3% 23.2%
Max drawdown edge FNDA (slight) −43.0% −44.9%
Downside capture 106.7% 91.9%
Beta 1.11 0.95
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PSC 0.43 0.49
Sortino edge PSC 0.62 0.70
Treynor 0.087 0.118
Calmar edge PSC (slight) 0.24 0.26
Against the benchmark
Alpha −4.4% a year +2.4% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.48 0.96
Information ratio −0.28 0.24
Tracking error 10.8% 8.1%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDA against VOO, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; PSC against IWM, Sep 30, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

PSC returned more: +204.6% to +164.4%. FNDA swung slightly less: 22.3% to 23.2%. FNDA fell slightly less at its worst: −43.0% to −44.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDA vs PSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDAPSCEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+164.4%+204.6%PSCPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.1%+11.7%PSCTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+129.1%+170.5%PSCPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.3%23.2%FNDA (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%16.0%FNDA (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−43.0%−44.9%FNDA (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.9%84.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture106.7%91.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.110.95Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.730.88Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.430.49PSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.620.70PSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0870.118Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.240.26PSC (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−4.4% a year+2.4% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.480.96Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−10.2% to +1.4%−2.5% to +7.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.280.24Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error10.8%8.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 525 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

25%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDA and PSC hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

25% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDA PSC
Victoria's Secret & Co 0.46% 0.56%
Compass Inc 0.42% 0.72%
Par Pacific Holdings Inc 0.35% 0.34%
Terex Corp 0.31% 0.50%
EnerSys 0.27% 0.60%
Moog Inc 0.25% 0.46%
Urban Outfitters Inc 0.24% 0.43%
Black Hills Corp 0.23% 0.53%
Plexus Corp 0.23% 0.32%
Enova International Inc 0.22% 0.76%
TTM Technologies Inc 0.21% 1.03%
Cal-Maine Foods Inc 0.20% 0.34%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDA
Lumentum Holdings Inc 0.55%
Delek US Holdings Inc 0.39%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co 0.36%
Twilio Inc 0.34%
Crescent Energy Co 0.33%
MKS Inc 0.32%
Royalty Pharma PLC 0.32%
Coherent Corp 0.32%
Only in PSC
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.38%
Hims & Hers Health Inc 1.31%
Sezzle Inc 1.30%
Vicor Corp 1.05%
Argan Inc 1.03%
Bread Financial Holdings Inc 0.92%
Guardant Health Inc 0.87%
Planet Labs PBC 0.84%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +16.4% +21.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark +2.7 pts vs VOO +6.9 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.38%
Already in the S&P 500 6.6% 0.0%
Holdings 913 506
Net assets, FNDA as of Aug 31, 2026 and PSC as of Oct 26, 2026 $9.1bn $2.7bn

FNDA and PSC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6111C087C9

FNDA and PSC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Holdings in common. 25% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDA returned +16.4% and PSC +21.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.6 points.
  3. Cost. FNDA charges 0.25% of assets a year and PSC 0.38%, a gap of 0.13 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PSC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDA

FNDA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 913 positions, with the top ten at 3.8%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PSC

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index.

PSC is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 11.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDA or PSC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDA returned +16.4% and PSC +21.0%.
Which is cheaper, FNDA or PSC?
FNDA is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDA and PSC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of FNDA and 0% of PSC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDA against PSC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnda-vs-psc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.