Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to VT's +13.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and VT

Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.

At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
+13.5%
VT total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.06%
VT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VT costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 42.1 points.

PDBC vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCVT
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%+13.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE Global All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.06%
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026$8.0bn$81.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight55%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund22.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and VT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC VT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in VT
NVIDIA Corp 4.54%
Apple Inc 4.11%
Microsoft Corp 3.25%
Amazon.com Inc 2.06%
Alphabet Inc 1.73%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.62%
Broadcom Inc 1.39%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Total World Stock
Total return, 1 year +55.6% +13.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.06%
Holdings 1 10194
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.0bn $81.8bn

PDBC and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

VT

VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or VT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and VT +13.5%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or VT?
VT is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-vt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.