Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PDBC vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to URTH's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PDBC and URTH
Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.
Pair scorecard
URTH costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 42.5 points; URTH is 1.1 times larger.
| Measure | PDBC | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +55.6% | +13.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI World Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.24% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $8.0bn | $8.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 69% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 27.2% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PDBC and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
URTH
URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or URTH?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and URTH +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, PDBC or URTH?
- URTH is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PDBC against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-urth
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PDBC against URTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-urth
[PDBC against URTH (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-urth)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.