Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PABU vs VV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PABU returned +8.2% to VV's +13.4%; 46% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PABU and VV
Net assets: $2.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF, and $54.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
VV costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.2 points; VV is far larger, $54.1bn against $2.5bn.
| Measure | PABU | VV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +8.2% | +13.4% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index | Morningstar US Large Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $2.5bn | $54.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 46% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 49.1% | 39.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 29, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 234 weekly returnsVV returned more: +97.0% to +81.9%. VV swung slightly less: 16.3% to 17.7%. VV fell slightly less at its worst: −17.3% to −19.0%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | PABU | VV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +81.9% | +97.0% | VV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +14.2% | +16.3% | VV | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +73.3% | +85.2% | VV | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.7% | 16.3% | VV (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.6% | 10.7% | VV (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −19.0% | −17.3% | VV (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.60 | 0.74 | VV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.91 | 1.12 | VV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.75 | 0.94 | VV | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 234 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PABU and VV hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
46% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PABU and VV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PABU and VV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. PABU follows MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index and VV follows Morningstar US Large Cap Index.
- Holdings in common. 46% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PABU returned +8.2% and VV +13.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
PABU
PABU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +8.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 49.1%.
VV
VV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 423 positions, with the top ten at 39.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PABU or VV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PABU returned +8.2% and VV +13.4%.
- Which is cheaper, PABU or VV?
- VV is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PABU against VV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-vv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PABU against VV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-vv
[PABU against VV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-vv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.