Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PABU vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PABU returned +8.2% to RDVY's +17.6%; 15% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PABU and RDVY

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.5bn for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF and $25.4bn for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.

At a glance
+8.2%
PABU total return, 1 year
+17.6%
RDVY total return, 1 year
0.10%
PABU expense ratio
0.47%
RDVY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PABU costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.4 points; RDVY is 10.2 times larger.

PABU vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePABURDVY
Return
Total return, 1 year+8.2%+17.6%
Drawdown
Below its high5.3%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select IndexNasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.10%0.47%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$2.5bn$25.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common15%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund49.1%22.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 29, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 234 weekly returns
PABU RDVY
Return
Total return edge RDVY (slight) +81.9% +87.3%
Annualized edge RDVY (slight) +14.2% +15.0%
Price return edge Tie +73.3% +73.3%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 17.7% 17.8%
Max drawdown edge RDVY (slight) −19.0% −17.2%
Downside capture 107.3% 104.2%
Beta 1.07 1.09
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge RDVY (slight) 0.60 0.63
Sortino edge RDVY (slight) 0.91 0.94
Treynor 0.099 0.113
Calmar edge RDVY 0.75 0.87
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.2% a year −1.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.42 −0.44
Information ratio −0.41 0.02
Tracking error 3.5% 8.0%

Each against its own benchmark: PABU against PBUS, Apr 29, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; RDVY against VOO, Jan 17, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

RDVY returned slightly more: +87.3% to +81.9%. PABU and RDVY swung about the same: 17.7% and 17.8%. RDVY fell slightly less at its worst: −17.2% to −19.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PABU vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePABURDVYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+81.9%+87.3%RDVY (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.2%+15.0%RDVY (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+73.3%+73.3%TiePrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.7%17.8%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.6%11.9%PABU (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.0%−17.2%RDVY (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture108.8%106.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture107.3%104.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.071.09Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.960.83Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.600.63RDVY (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.910.94RDVY (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0990.113Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.750.87RDVYAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.2% a year−1.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.42−0.44Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−5.4% to +0.9%−5.4% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.410.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.5%8.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 234 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

15%

By the books each fund has filed, PABU and RDVY hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

15% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PABU RDVY
MICROSOFT 7.93% 2.22%
NVIDIA 9.30% 2.13%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.19% 1.91%
VISA CLASS A 1.77% 2.26%
APPLE 7.66% 1.72%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.60% 1.82%
SALESFORCE 1.30% 1.65%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 1.72% 1.02%
AFLAC 0.53% 1.58%
CHARLES SCHWAB 0.38% 1.36%
KLA 0.38% 1.88%
INTUIT 0.23% 0.47%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PABU
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.88%
TESLA INC 3.58%
ALPHABET CLASS C 3.54%
ELI LILLY 3.53%
BROADCOM INC 3.31%
SNOWFLAKE 3.28%
SERVICENOW 3.08%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 2.89%
Only in RDVY
The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.42%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 2.32%
Accenture plc 2.19%
The Allstate Corporation 2.17%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.14%
Expedia Group, Inc. 2.13%
Chubb Limited 2.12%
Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2.11%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers
Total return, 1 year +8.2% +17.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark −5.1 pts vs PBUS +3.9 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.47%
Already in the S&P 500 93.1% 94.3%
Holdings 88 72
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.5bn $25.4bn

PABU and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-63B31161C2

PABU and RDVY are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. PABU follows MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index and RDVY follows Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 15% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PABU returned +8.2% and RDVY +17.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PABU and RDVY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PABU

PABU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +8.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 49.1%.

RDVY

RDVY tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 22.1%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PABU or RDVY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PABU returned +8.2% and RDVY +17.6%.
Which is cheaper, PABU or RDVY?
PABU is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PABU and RDVY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of PABU and 94% of RDVY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PABU against RDVY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-rdvy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.