Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PABU vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PABU returned +8.2% to SCHX's +13.1%; 42% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PABU and SCHX
Net assets: $2.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF, and $74.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHX costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.9 points.
| Measure | PABU | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +8.2% | +13.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, PABU as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026 | $2.5bn | $74.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 42% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 49.1% | 36.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PABU and SCHX hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
42% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PABU and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PABU and SCHX are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. PABU follows MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index and SCHX follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 42% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PABU returned +8.2% and SCHX +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
PABU
PABU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +8.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 49.1%.
SCHX
SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 747 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PABU or SCHX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PABU returned +8.2% and SCHX +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, PABU or SCHX?
- SCHX is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PABU against SCHX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-schx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PABU against SCHX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-schx
[PABU against SCHX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-schx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.