Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PABU vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PABU returned +8.2% to QUAL's +13.1%; 40% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PABU and QUAL

Net assets: $2.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF, and $48.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

At a glance
+8.2%
PABU total return, 1 year
+13.1%
QUAL total return, 1 year
0.10%
PABU expense ratio
0.15%
QUAL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PABU costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.9 points; QUAL is 19.3 times larger.

PABU vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePABUQUAL
Return
Total return, 1 year+8.2%+13.1%
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select IndexMSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.10%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026$2.5bn$48.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common40%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund49.1%44.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 29, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 234 weekly returns
PABU QUAL
Return
Total return edge QUAL (slight) +81.9% +90.2%
Annualized edge QUAL (slight) +14.2% +15.4%
Price return edge QUAL (slight) +73.3% +80.5%
Risk
Volatility edge QUAL (slight) 17.7% 16.4%
Max drawdown edge QUAL −19.0% −17.0%
Downside capture 107.3% 98.8%
Beta 1.07 0.97
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QUAL 0.60 0.69
Sortino edge QUAL 0.91 1.04
Treynor 0.099 0.126
Calmar edge QUAL 0.75 0.90
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.2% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.42 0.59
Information ratio −0.41 0.06
Tracking error 3.5% 3.7%

Each against its own benchmark: PABU against PBUS, Apr 29, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; QUAL against MLRG, Jul 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QUAL returned slightly more: +90.2% to +81.9%. QUAL swung slightly less: 16.4% to 17.7%. QUAL fell less at its worst: −17.0% to −19.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PABU vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePABUQUALEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+81.9%+90.2%QUAL (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.2%+15.4%QUAL (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+73.3%+80.5%QUAL (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.7%16.4%QUAL (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.6%10.8%QUAL (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.0%−17.0%QUALDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture108.8%98.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture107.3%98.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.070.97Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.960.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.600.69QUALReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.911.04QUALReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0990.126Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.750.90QUALAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSMLRGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.2% a year+0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.420.59Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−5.4% to +0.9%−1.4% to +2.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.410.06Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.5%3.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 234 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

40%

By the books each fund has filed, PABU and QUAL hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

40% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PABU QUAL
MICROSOFT 7.93% 8.09%
APPLE 7.66% 7.38%
NVIDIA 9.30% 6.28%
ELI LILLY 3.53% 4.04%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.19% 4.06%
VISA CLASS A 1.77% 3.44%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 1.72% 2.40%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.60% 1.82%
ALPHABET CLASS C 3.54% 1.43%
PROLOGIS REIT 1.83% 0.73%
BLACKROCK 0.47% 0.49%
CHARLES SCHWAB 0.38% 0.41%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PABU
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.88%
TESLA INC 3.58%
BROADCOM INC 3.31%
SNOWFLAKE 3.28%
SERVICENOW 3.08%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 2.89%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CO 2.45%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP REIT INC 2.04%
Only in QUAL
TJX 3.50%
LAM RESEARCH 2.84%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.50%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.39%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.14%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.94%
ROSS STORES INC 1.41%
MERCK & CO INC 1.34%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year +8.2% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark −5.1 pts vs PBUS −0.5 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 93.1% 97.2%
Holdings 88 119
Net assets, PABU as of Oct 27, 2026 and QUAL as of Oct 28, 2026 $2.5bn $48.2bn

PABU and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E596A06C72

PABU and QUAL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. PABU follows MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index and QUAL follows MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 40% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PABU returned +8.2% and QUAL +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PABU and QUAL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PABU

PABU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +8.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 49.1%.

QUAL

QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 119 positions, with the top ten at 44.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PABU or QUAL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PABU returned +8.2% and QUAL +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, PABU or QUAL?
PABU is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PABU and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of PABU and 97% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PABU against QUAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-qual

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.