MTUM vs SPHB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MTUM and SPHB hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and SPHB returned +37.4% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $20.3bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and $1.0bn for Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF.
MTUM costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.6 points; MTUM is far larger, $20.3bn against $1.0bn.
| MTUM | SPHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Net assets | $20.3bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.8% | +37.4% |
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index | S&P 500 High Beta Index |
| Holdings in common | 34% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 9, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 20.4% |
| Below its high | 7.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and SPHB hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
34% in common
On the same fields
MTUM and SPHB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About SPHB
SPHB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +37.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or SPHB?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +25.8% and SPHB +37.4%.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or SPHB?
- MTUM is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MTUM against SPHB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-sphb
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). MTUM against SPHB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-sphb
[MTUM against SPHB (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-sphb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.