Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs MTUM: how they differ

IJH and MTUM hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and MTUM hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJH and MTUM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJHMTUM
ATI0.78%0.20%
ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD0.53%0.20%
TWILIO CLASS A1.00%0.20%
ILLUMINA INC0.87%0.17%
OKTA CLASS A0.82%0.17%
TECHNIPFMC PLC0.86%0.17%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC0.72%0.16%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY0.64%0.15%
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM0.57%0.10%
XPO0.61%0.10%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.16%0.09%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS0.61%0.09%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJHOnly in MTUM
EVERPURE INC CLASS A 0.85%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.39%
TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65%MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.20%
US FOODS HOLDING 0.60%INTEL CORPORATION 4.14%
COEUR MINING 0.60%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.48%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.60%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.38%
ROYAL GOLD 0.59%SANDISK 3.10%
ROKU CLASS A 0.58%APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.87%
WOODWARD 0.57%ALPHABET CLASS A 2.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IJH and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isS&P MidCap 400MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+21.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.1 pts+4.3 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.15%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%98.2%
Holdings405128

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 128 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or MTUM?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or MTUM?
IJH charges 0.05% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 98% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against MTUM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against MTUM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijh-vs-mtum Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources