MSLC vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees

MSLC and SPYM hold 79% of their weight in the same names, and SPYM returned +17.3% over the year. Net assets: $4.0bn on May 31, 2026 for Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF, and $178.5bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF.

SPYM costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points; SPYM is far larger, $58.7bn against $2.8bn.

MSLC vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MSLCSPYM
Expense ratio0.39%0.02%
Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025$2.8bn$58.7bn
Total return, 1 year+14.3%+17.3%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Index ?
Holdings in common79%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.8%39.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+14.3%
MSLC total return, 1 year
+17.3%
SPYM total return, 1 year
0.39%
MSLC expense ratio
0.02%
SPYM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MSLC and SPYM hold 79% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

79% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding MSLC SPYM
NVIDIA CORP 6.61% 8.33%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.98% 5.79%
APPLE INC 4.87% 7.42%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.46% 3.72%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.45% 3.05%
BROADCOM INC 2.87% 2.56%
META PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A 2.33% 2.37%
ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.14% 2.45%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.76% 1.75%
TESLA INC 1.32% 1.58%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.37% 1.31%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B 1.10% 1.42%
Only in MSLC
EXXON MOBIL CORP 0.95%
BROOKFIELD CORP 0.66%
HEICO CORP-CLASS A 0.16%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR-SP ADR 0.16%
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC 0.15%
ASML HOLDING NV-NY REG SHS 0.13%
OWENS CORNING 0.12%
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC 0.10%
Only in SPYM
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.03%
BLOOM ENERGY CORP A 0.12%
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC 0.10%
TE CONNECTIVITY PLC 0.09%
NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.09%
ONEOK INC 0.09%
HONEYWELL AEROSPACE INC 0.07%
VYLOR INC 0.07%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

MSLC
Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +14.3% +17.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +17.3% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not available 0.0 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.02%
Already in the S&P 500 92.3% 99.8%
Holdings 1007 506
Net assets, MSLC as of May 31, 2026 and SPYM as of Oct 8, 2026 $4.0bn $178.5bn
Former ticker none SPLG

MSLC and SPYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About MSLC

MSLC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,007 positions, with the top ten at 34.8%.

About SPYM

SPYM tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index ?. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.02% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 39.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MSLC or SPYM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MSLC returned +14.3% and SPYM +17.3%.
Which is cheaper, MSLC or SPYM?
SPYM is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MSLC and SPYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MSLC and 100% of SPYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MSLC against SPYM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mslc-vs-spym

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.