Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MSFO vs VTI: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MSFO returned +0.2% to VTI's +13.5%, and VTI charges 0.03% to MSFO's 1.03%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MSFO and VTI
Net assets: $100m on Oct 27, 2026 for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF, and $689.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF.
Pair scorecard
VTI costs 1.00 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.3 points.
| Measure | MSFO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.2% | +13.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 30.2% | rose 12.2% |
| Latest payout, annualized | 34.0% | |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 89% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Benchmark: Microsoft (MSFT) | Morningstar US Total Market Index |
| Against its benchmark, same days | ahead by 1.4 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.03% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, MSFO as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTI as of Sep 30, 2026 | $100m | $689.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 88% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 34.7% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MSFO and VTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MSFO and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.
MSFO
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MSFO paid 26.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.2%. Microsoft (MSFT) returned −1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 34.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 89% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
VTI
VTI tracks an index of US total market. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3,521 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.
Questions people ask
- Are MSFO and VTI in the same category?
- MSFO is an option-income ETF and VTI is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, MSFO or VTI?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MSFO returned +0.2% and VTI +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, MSFO or VTI?
- VTI is cheaper, by 1.00 percentage points a year. That is about $100 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MSFO against VTI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/msfo-vs-vti
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MSFO against VTI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/msfo-vs-vti
[MSFO against VTI (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/msfo-vs-vti)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.