Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MSFO vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MSFO returned +0.2% to VOO's +13.7%, and VOO charges 0.03% to MSFO's 1.03%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MSFO and VOO

Net assets: $100m on Oct 27, 2026 for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF, and $1.0tn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
+0.2%
MSFO total return, 1 year
+13.7%
VOO total return, 1 year
1.03%
MSFO expense ratio
0.03%
VOO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VOO costs 1.00 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.5 points.

MSFO vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMSFOVOO
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.2%+13.7%
Price change, 1 yearfell 30.2%rose 12.4%
Latest payout, annualized34.0%
Return of capital, issuer estimate89% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBenchmark: Microsoft (MSFT)S&P 500 Index
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 1.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.03%0.03%
Net assets, MSFO as of Oct 27, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026$100m$1.0tn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 1, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 164 weekly returns
MSFO VOO
Return
Total return edge VOO +59.4% +75.7%
Annualized edge VOO +15.9% +19.6%
Price return edge VOO −40.2% +68.5%
Risk
Volatility edge VOO 22.3% 14.1%
Max drawdown edge VOO −27.1% −16.7%
Downside capture 88.2% 99.9%
Beta 0.80 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VOO 0.57 1.02
Sortino edge VOO 0.94 1.58
Treynor 0.158 0.134
Calmar edge VOO 0.59 1.17
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.0% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.38 0.51
Information ratio −0.27 0.02
Tracking error 7.0% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: MSFO against MSFT, Sep 1, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026; VOO against IVV, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VOO returned more: +75.7% to +59.4%. VOO swung less: 14.1% to 22.3%. VOO fell less at its worst: −16.7% to −27.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MSFO vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMSFOVOOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+59.4%+75.7%VOOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.9%+19.6%VOOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−40.2%+68.5%VOOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.3%14.1%VOOSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%9.1%VOOLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.1%−16.7%VOODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture70.8%99.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.2%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.801.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.961.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.571.02VOOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.941.58VOOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1580.134Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.591.17VOOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMSFTIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.0% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.380.51Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.1% to +6.0%−0.1% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.270.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.0%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 164 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MSFO and VOO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MSFO VOO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MSFO
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 25.91%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 13.60%
MSFT 11/20/2026 480.01 C 11.13%
MSFT US 10/30/26 C535 1.14%
MSFT US 10/30/26 C530 0.73%
MSFT US 10/30/26 C532.5 0.70%
MSFT 11/20/2026 480.01 P -0.54%
MSFT US 10/30/26 C522.5 -1.01%
Only in VOO
NVIDIA Corp 8.40%
Apple Inc 7.39%
Microsoft Corp 5.79%
Amazon.com Inc 3.72%
Alphabet Inc 3.07%
Broadcom Inc 2.54%
Alphabet Inc 2.46%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.43%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Income ETF Stock ETF
What it is synthetic covered call, vs MSFT Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +0.2% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.2% (MSFT) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +1.4 pts vs MSFT 0.0 pts vs IVV
Cash paid, 1 year 26.1% not an income fund
Expense ratio 1.03% 0.03%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 507
Net assets, MSFO as of Oct 27, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026 $100m $1.0tn

MSFO and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-29F6284CB3

MSFO and VOO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MSFO is measured against Microsoft (MSFT) and VOO follows S&P 500 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 28, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MSFO returned +0.2% and VOO +13.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 13.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MSFO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MSFO

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MSFO paid 26.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.2%. Microsoft (MSFT) returned −1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 34.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 89% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

VOO

VOO tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%.

Questions people ask

Are MSFO and VOO in the same category?
MSFO is an option-income ETF and VOO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, MSFO or VOO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MSFO returned +0.2% and VOO +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, MSFO or VOO?
VOO is cheaper, by 1.00 percentage points a year. That is about $100 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MSFO against VOO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/msfo-vs-voo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.