Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ULTY vs VTI: how they differ

Over the year VTI returned more, +17.2% against −5.8%, and VTI charges 0.03% against 1.30%.

YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ULTY and VTI hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ULTY and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingULTYVTI
NVIDIA Corp4.80%6.37%
Amazon.com Inc5.16%3.19%
Alphabet Inc5.66%2.90%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc4.15%1.31%
Lam Research Corp4.99%0.75%
Palantir Technologies Inc4.40%0.35%
Analog Devices Inc5.47%0.27%
Quanta Services Inc4.95%0.15%
Fortinet Inc3.56%0.13%
Robinhood Markets Inc3.84%0.11%
Coherent Corp4.50%0.11%
Astera Labs Inc4.56%0.10%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ULTYOnly in VTI
IREN Ltd 4.80%Apple Inc 5.88%
VanEck Gold Miners ETF/USA 4.33%Microsoft Corp 3.84%
Amplify Junior Silver Miners E 4.21%Broadcom Inc 2.48%
Shopify Inc 3.69%Alphabet Inc 2.29%
Southern Copper Corp 3.20%Micron Technology Inc 1.80%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.71%
Tesla Inc 1.64%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

ULTY and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ULTY
YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsIncome ETFCore index fund
IssuerYieldMaxVanguard
What it issynthetic covered call, vs SPYUS total market
Total return, 1 year−5.8%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−23.3 pts−0.3 pts
Cash paid, 1 year46.9%not an income fund
Expense ratio1.30%0.03%
Holdingsnot filed3531

ULTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, ULTY paid 46.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 53.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −5.8%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 23.3 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 61.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ULTY or VTI?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ULTY returned −5.8% and VTI returned +17.2%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ULTY or VTI?
ULTY charges 1.30% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are ULTY and VTI the same kind of fund?
No. ULTY is an option-income ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ULTY against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ULTY against VTI, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ulty-vs-vti Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources